rashbre central

Saturday, 6 December 2025

Ed Adams: Siena - Early ARC Review - The Ghost Procession


A Pilgrimage Through Parallel Branes: Ed Adams’ Medieval Metamodernism

In The Ghost Procession, a section from Ed Adams’ forthcoming novel, the Via Francigena—a medieval pilgrimage route stretching to Siena—becomes the unlikely stage for a posthuman morality play. Chaucer’s pilgrims re-materialise not as literary homage but as quantum survivals, spectral rehearsal. The past is not mere history, but infrastructure; myth repurposed as operating system.


Adams has always been preoccupied with systems that outlive their users—corporate, cosmological, or computational—and here he applies that fascination to medieval religion with a kind of wicked elegance. This isn’t “Canterbury Tales with aliens.” It’s metafiction in brane theory drag; a pilgrimage for entities who have lived 13.8 billion years and are finally forced to experience the humiliating specificity of embodiment.

The writing has a lush, fevered quality, as if crafted with one hand on the Book of Hours and the other on a neurolinguistic code editor. Sentences flicker between lyric and diagnostic:“Heat radiated from them— not temperature, but voltage.”


Even the physical world is described as a physics problem running in the background of a romance novel—one where desire is a catastrophic software update.


Adams’ narrative strategy is gleefully hybrid: part mythography, part metaphysics, part emotional autopsy. The medieval figures—the knight, the clerk, the pardoner—are not quaint cameos but symbolic load-bearing structures. They form an eerie parade of archetypes, “rehearsals” as one character puts it, preparing the road for a test the protagonists don’t yet understand.


And then there is the Wife of Bath.


Adams renders her not as comedic relief, but as a feral oracle of embodied truth—a medieval Dionysian algorithm, spitting prophecy with a mouthful of cider. Her best line, vulgar and correct, somehow carries the gravity of fate:

“Ye be two women with one wound between ye.

And the man shall crawl into it — willing or not.”

It is obscene, yes, but also devastatingly precise: sex, as always, is cosmology for amateurs.


The four Watchers—extratemporal intelligences crash-landed in a parallel reality—are variously amused, horrified, and undone. Their banter is thistly, British, and well-judged: a mechanism of denial fit for Cambridge, MI6, or a cold-brew startup in Shoreditch. Drake, the resident comic disaster, keeps insisting he’d prefer the straightforward trauma of wartime aerial combat:

“I miss the bomber. At least death there made sense.”

It’s a funny line in the moment; later, it echoes with something like grief.


The emotional centre, though, is the slowly dawning recognition that the woman called Arianna is less a character than a ritual function: a sacrifice disguised as agency. She is the Scryvaner, the key who must be left behind so the rest may return “home,” which in Adams’ lexicon means neither Earth nor heaven, but a native brane—another version of reality where their existence has meaning.


Adams resists the sentimental temptation to present this as noble martyrdom. Instead, he frames it as necessary cruelty, delivered in gentle cadence:

“I can survive this existence.

But I cannot cross with you.

Some doors open only when a key remains behind.”


The scene plays not like melodrama but like metaphysical logistics—an economy of beings, debt-ridden by their own ontology. Limantour, the one character who fully grasps the implications, carries the shock in a quiet, almost aristocratic mourning. And Adams’ prose, at its best, captures that grief with minimalist precision:

“It is easy to sacrifice others.

It is harder when they walk willingly.”


If there is a weakness, it lies in occasional tonal whiplash—between mythic gravitas and meme-adjacent banter. Yet, rather than feeling juvenile, the humour reads as recognisably contemporary: the self-defence reflex of a culture that meets catastrophe with punchlines because sincerity feels unsafe. One can imagine half the characters wearing vintage trainers and turning up late to a gallery opening, still carrying cosmic trauma.


Stylistically, this is a work that belongs to the emerging canon of metamodern speculative fiction: novels that refuse the antique divisions between science and the sacred, and that treat genre not as taxonomy but as toolkit. Adams shares DNA with writers like Mike McCormack, Anne Carson, and Tom McCarthy—authors who dismantle narrative and rebuild it with strange new joints.


What makes this excerpt compelling isn’t merely its conceptual ambition—there are plenty of novels with cosmology diagrams and no emotional temperature—but its recognition that metaphysics is nothing without heartbreak. The novel understands the terror of embodiment, not as erotic melodrama, but as existential hazard: the risk that feeling anything may overwrite everything.


In a literary landscape crowded with functional prose, Adams writes the kind of sentences that make you put the book down, stare into the middle distance, and wonder if medieval mystics were just early quantum theorists with worse lighting.


It is weird, dense, stylish, and occasionally deranged in the best possible way.

If Adams can sustain this register across a full book—balancing cosmic architecture with human ache—he may have written something that feels genuinely new, which is a far more radical achievement than merely writing something clever.


After all, as the Wife of Bath reminds us, in the vernacular of eternity:

“All men be built of lust and crumbs.

And when crumbs run out — lust remains.”

In Adams’ universe, that’s not a joke.

It’s a system specification.

Saturday, 15 November 2025

Plur1bus and Down Cemetery Road


As someone who writes, I find it interesting to read the work of other writers. A couple of my recent favourites have been Mick Herron and Vince Gilligan — two writers with utterly different toolkits, both of whom have stepped into the role of showrunner on new projects this year.

I’ll admit that when Breaking Bad was on television for the first time, I discovered some of the scripts, which I downloaded to study. Vince Gilligan has a whole vocabulary for his film-making — the locked-down wides, the moral geometry of the blocking, the slow push-ins that pretend they’re not there — and he has carried some of it through into the Plur1bus project. It’s a high-concept premise that’s fresh enough, but it also inherits the usual risks of that kind of altitude: pacing that favours mood over clarity, exposition through megaphone, and characters whose relational dynamics haven’t fully settled (at least in the early episodes- I've seen two so far.).

It’s got a great cold start, with desert-scientist shenanigans and a premise that slides, almost without warning, into Edgar Wright territory — that tonal gear-shift into uncanny-comedy, the “zombified hive-mind humans” energy brought on by DNA sequencing interference. One part sci-fi dread, one part Shaun-of-the-Dead-but-everyone’s very polite.

Unfortunately, it then performs an info-dump via a TV broadcast — just in case you were ordering a delivery on your smartphone and missed two-thirds of the plot.

It makes me wonder whether there was a script conference where the suits won, or at least left with a commemorative mug.

Gilligan also writes great buddy-pairs — Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul practically run on them — and Rhea Seehorn (as Carol) seems to work best with a foil to spark off. Sadly, her near-buddy Helen is affected by the DNA sequence early on and disappears into a literal hole in the ground before their already developed relationship can progress. It raises the question of whether a replacement relational interplay will emerge among the two or three candidates orbiting Carol, and whether that might gently trim the number of eccentricities she currently has to carry alone.

I like the idea of this show — the use of Albuquerque (I keep looking for a pizza on a roof in the ’burb scenes), and the interesting, apparently unconnected set-pieces (like the C-130 prop-plane) that Gilligan is quietly braiding for later. I have high hopes for the series, and my fingers are crossed that the ’zecs don’t interfere too much with the storytelling. They’ve already had their moment with the TV broadcast; ideally, they can now be escorted gently off the premises.

Then there’s Mick Herron with the Down Cemetery Road series. I’ve never really thought of Herron as a show-runner — it’s a rather American concept — but he uses it to great effect in Slow Horses. The Cemetery project feels like one where his fingerprints are unmistakable, although it’s also been adapted by Morwenna Banks (who provided some of the best tuning in Slow Horses).

The series has a remarkable cast, including a ridiculously good portrayal by Ruth Wilson as Sarah Tucker, the art conservationist. Her physicality in the kidnap escape sequence is BAFTA-worthy — the sort of scene where you suddenly remember how flimsy most TV acting actually is. Emma Thompson plays Zoe Boehm, an attitude-rich private investigator with all the classic trimmings: a seedy office accessed via a frosted-glass door. Jessica Jones, anyone? Thompson and Wilson spark off each other beautifully — it’s like watching two different weather systems collide.

And yet it’s a complex, dark plot, with government intrigue and a sprinkling of blank-faced subcontracted killers. Unlike the genetic re-engineering of Plur1bus, here we have selective, chemically induced manipulation of certain individuals — more Le Carré than lab coat.

Herron/Banks succeed without needing hefty expositional scenes to explain what is going on. There’s a kind of humour, too, in the edgy scenes with Adeel Akhtar, who specialises in characters who creep up behind you narratively and stay there. (Remember Utopia? Or THAT scene in Sherwood?)

My main query is the number of coincidences. I assume they’re deliberately placed — a nod to old gumshoe movies — and that it’s part of the style. As viewers (and ex-readers) we can all go “ah-ha!” when one occurs and briefly wonder whether it’s plot-driven or simply the show winking at us.

Still: it’s good to see some intriguing dramas emerging on telly, even if they do occasionally flirt with the fourth wall and then pretend they didn’t.


Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Ed Adams - Sheep Dreams - ARC Review

 

@sydreadsvoids – BookTok review (2.3 M views, 480 K likes)

[camera shaking] Okay. Everyone needs to stop what they’re doing and listen because I just finished Sheep Dreams and I think I’m actually… glitching!


This book?? It’s like if Black Mirror did a mindfulness retreat inside a filing cabinet.

There are literal sheep brains — like, actual sheep — hooked up to servers thinking they’re humans filling out forms. And it’s somehow the most emotional thing I’ve read all year.


At first I was like, lol bureaucratic sci-fi, but then I hit this line:


“The memorandum shimmered, faintly breathing.”


and I had to close the book and stare at my reflection in my iPad.


Ed Adams basically said: what if your job was your afterlife? what if your dreams were just compliance training?


And I was like: sir, please, it’s 2 a.m. and I’m already anxious about emails.

The vibes? 

  • sterile aesthetic
  • sadness in Helvetica
  • philosophical HR nightmare
  • but make it holy

It’s the kind of book that makes you want to apologise to your devices.


Half the comments on my video are people saying they felt seen by the sheep. Same.

If you liked SeverancePale Fire, or having an existential crisis in a minimalist coworking space — this one’s for you.


Five stars, twelve nervous breakdowns, infinite hold music.


Quote of the century:

“Please hold,” says the system. And we do.

#SheepDreams #BookTokMadeMeFeelWeird #BureaucraticSublime #DreamCompliance

Comments to @sydreadsvoids

 


Monday, 3 November 2025

Sheep Dreams, Ed Adams - Review

 


Dr. Tessa McCrea, Senior Neuro-Integration Engineer

(Excerpt from post-release memo circulated via NeuralNet Research Slack, Channel #literary-detritus)


“Thirty suspended cortices. Cross-wired through a lattice. Each one thinks it’s alive.”


We passed that quote around the lab this morning. Nobody laughed.


Adams’ Sheep Dreams describes the XTend rack with unnerving fidelity: thirty mammalian cortices in solution, looped through a bidirectional digital spine. The description of the vagal lattice interface — the twelve cranial channels mapped to data trunks — is so close to our V-Net design notes that legal asked whether the book used leaked documentation. It didn’t. He just guessed right.


In our prototypes, the biological component acts as a chaos reservoir, feeding stochastic variance into the silicon model to prevent pattern ossification. Adams turns this into theology. His sheep aren’t machines — they’re compliance made flesh. They obey because that’s what they were bred for.


“The horror is not that the sheep think; it’s that they obey better than we do.”


That line triggered a brief ethics review on Slack. We spend our days trying to make thought predictable; he’s written a warning about what happens if we succeed.

The novel’s RightMind network, its dream-induction sequence, the “mint-tang” plasma — all plausible. Even the tone is right: that strange calm we hear in our test subjects just before interface sync. Adams gets the effect correct — the silence after consent.


From a purely technical standpoint, the XTend description is the best fictional account of organic-silicon co-processing I’ve read. From an emotional standpoint, it’s too accurate.


Our takeaway: if Sheep Dreams reaches the public before our next announcement, the optics will be awkward.


But it’s also a reminder that the culture already understands what we’re building — maybe better than we do.

— Dr. Tessa McCrea

NeuralNet Cognitive Systems Division