started with a mouse and ended with a telly

I re-accessorised my iMac recently, by moving to the new generation keyboards and mouse, plus updating the home's Apple TV to the new type. It all started because of a broken mouse on a PC, so I needed to 'trickle down' a component.

Keyboard first.
It's a keyboard after all, this time with a slightly lower profile than the old one. There's both a lower rake on its slope and also the keys themselves are slightly thinner. I didn't expect it, but it took me a day or more to get used to the lower pitch. They've changed a few of the graphics on the keys and removed the old 'option' symbol, replacing it with the word 'option'. The main advantage is that I won't need to keep a box of spare batteries in an adjacent cupboard for their all too frequent replacement. The new keyboard is rechargeable using a lightning connector which is included in the box. When connected it makes the keyboard seem kind-of old-school.

Magic Mouse II
This was my original reason for visiting the store. There's so little cosmetic difference that I thought I might have accidentally picked up the wrong unit. Even the box omits the II from the labelling. Inside it is the newer unit, with only the inner leaflet really giving away the difference. I'll be rotating the older mouse onto a work PC where the mouse had broken, but where I only use it occasionally when I'm doing presentations or similar. It's surprising how many PC people are still freaked by a mouse with 'no buttons' - "How do you use it?" etc.

Like the keyboard, this is a rechargeable unit, although in a moment of sheer obstinacy Apple have decided to make the charging point underneath the mouse guaranteeing that you can't use the mouse whilst charging. It would look so 'attached' wouldn't it? I decided not to get the trackpad unit. I'm very happy using a trackpad but a long time ago I realised that I still prefer a mouse if I'm doing something fiddly like drawing boxes or graphics.

Apple TV 4
I've come through the generations of Apple TV, although back in the early days I preferred to use a Mac mini as a TV device rather than the earliest and similar sized TV units. Nowadays the boxes are smaller and the main problem is more one of commercial rights. All the non-linear TV providers are in competition with one another and find ways to limit each others' programming.

Frankly, for general TV viewing the Sky TV box still seems to have the best EPG, at least in terms of broad usability. The Apple box is therefore an extra unit, although with Airplay it gets increasingly used to view things that have first been selected on a laptop and can be flipped onto the telly.

Our main television is also hooked up to an Onkyo media system, which has about 7 HDMI inputs and a couple of outputs, so the buttonage count from all of the remote controllers is probably at least 500.

That's why we use a single Logitech Harmony as the controller for everything - television, Sky, Apple TV, Amazon Prime, Spotify, iPlayer etc. plus some domestic chores like the fire, the central heating and mood lighting. If it sounds complicated, its not, because all of the options are programmed into the single handset and can be selected with options like 'Watch TV', 'Watch DVD', 'Fireplace' and so on.

When I said one handset, we actually have two - that's the full version with a small touch screen and the even simpler version which is more button based. I'd almost forgotten that once it is set up it can also be operated from an iPhone - although we never seem to do this. The clever part is that the Harmony is wireless rather than infra red, so can be used without pointing at the relevant devices. It also blasts out infra red from its hub, which can easily cover the area of all the TV devices.

Back to the Apple TV, the new handset is a small unit, albeit slightly larger than the old one. That's because it too has a touch capability now, as well as Siri support. My main trepidation was whether the new Apple would still work with the Harmony, but fear not, I plugged in the new Apple TV and then tried the Harmony buttons and everything still works fine. It's just that I had to reprogram a lot of password settings for the varied services before the Apple TV would work properly again.

Have I used the Siri function? I tried it and discovered the problem of licensing. I was in Netflix and said "Skip backwards last three minutes" or something similar. It started asking me about which team between Atlanta and Chicago or something - "Epic Fail" I think they say. It wasn't even trying to work with Netflix. Next I said "Interstellar" as a quick test to see what it would do. It immediately stopped the Netflix TV episode I was watching and took me to the Apple iTunes Store to ask me if I'd like to buy a copy of the Interstellar movie that I already have in my iTunes DVD library. So no, the Siri function needs a lot of work to make it usable. I like the idea of voice activated multi devices, but we've still got a way to go before we can say "Open the pod bay doors, Siri."

I think I can safely put the new remote controller away with all of the other ones unless I want to use it for gaming and instead rely on the Harmony for routine control.

As for Amazon, it doesn't even come up as an option in the TV's App library, although I've installed the youtube, vimeo and flickr which were embedded on the old TV3 but are App options on the TV4, as are a selection of games.

Briefly mentioning the games support, we're not really a gaming household, so I'd describe the games we do use as 'light entertainment' rather than grimy shoot-em-ups and drug cartel based car chases. I tried a simple platform game that involved making a bright red crab bounce up through various lily pads using the Apple TV handset in portrait mode as the controller. It works well and is sufficient to keep the telly gaming-friendly without needing clutter up the living space with piles of Xboxes and Playstations. I'll be looking for the inevitable family-friendly quiz program and some sort of karaoke as we approach the festive season.

So overall views on the three devices:

• The mouse was needed as a replacement for something that had failed - aside from charging, it works the same and is still my 'mouse of choice' for any device.
• The keyboard was an impulse addition, and apart from the battery saving is sufficiently similar to the prior one to be unremarkable.
• The Apple TV 4 keeps the living room current and provides future potential through the extra programmability. I'm more interested in the 'home' services aspect than specifically consuming iTunes content. It also gives me the older unit to move to another area where I can use it as a service on another TV.

inside the northern powerhouse suite

There's a lot of talk of the Northern Powerhouse at the moment, including last Friday's speech by Osborne, at the National Infrastructure Commission meeting in York National Railway Museum. Given the location, the locomotive in the background for most of the coverage didn't look very British.

It initially reminded me of a massive German locomotive, both in shape and because of the foreign-looking paint job. A kind of strange symbolism, maybe? My inner trainspotter had to take a closer look.

It turns out it was British designed and built in 1935 by Vulcan Foundry from Newton-le-Willows, Lancashire for the Chinese Government Railways. A KF7 class 4-8-4 No 607 to run on the Canton-Hankow railway. After decommissioning in 1981 it made its way back to the UK.

So it was made by British northern workers using British steel for export to China, where it worked for 46 years.

I've been in the north for the last few days. Stuck in huge traffic jams from road works, diversions and similar from the broken infrastructure. It makes me very wary of Osborne's words. All that time parked on the motorways has given me time to think. Since Osborne took office, there's been a 5.4% fall in infrastructure investment. Now he plans to announce a 'suite of asset sales' which the Treasury expects to raise billions of pounds to be ploughed back into projects. That sounds like code for more privatisation.

Potential examples of one-time sales are:

• Royal Bank of Scotland circa £23.2bn
• Lloyds Bank circa £13bn
• UK Asset Resolution (UKAR) circa £13n (that's the mortgage bits of Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley)
• Royal Mail circa £1.5bn
• Monetising the Student Loan Book £12bn (watch out if you have student loan)

Then there's a few more aspirational items like Channel 4, the debt-laden Network Rail and a few crony cash-in favourites like Ordnance Survey and Companies House. The trouble is, the total is still somewhere up to about the £70bn range, so maybe the rest will come from loans. I seem to remember the EU has agreed some support for the nuclear programme as an example.

It is all very mysterious, because on the one hand Osborne is having to rediscover ways to recoup the £5bn-£10bn gap caused by changes to the benefits plans, but at the same time he is promising £100bn of infrastructure spending by 2020. He says the bundle will have initial priorities of examining connections between the big northern cities, London’s transport system and energy infrastructure.

Ever the tactician, the bundling of statements makes better headlines.

As a quick example, my supposition is that the first £25bn goes on Hinckley Point C and perhaps another £30bn on another power station for Bradwell. That's more than the first half of the money gone without any of it directly reaching the north. Now let's add in the Crossrail 2 plans for London. That's another £32bn. Also southern.

Assuming the London plans don't also include airport spending, there's still £13bn left. I'll round it up to £15bn, because that's the amount that was stipulated last December for road improvements across the UK. I took a look at the statement and it breaks down as:

• north east and Yorkshire - 18 schemes worth around £2.3 billion and estimated to create 1,500 construction jobs
• north west – 9 schemes worth £800 million and estimated to create 600 jobs
• Midlands – 17 schemes worth £1.4 billion and estimated to create 900 jobs
• east of England – 15 schemes worth £1.5 billion and estimated to create 1,000 jobs
• London and south east – 18 schemes worth £1.4 billion and estimated to create 900 jobs
• south west – 7 schemes worth £2 billion and estimated to create 1,300 jobs

Of course, £15bn is still a considerable sum, but somewhat short of the £100bn headline. Slightly weasel-worded it talks about 'examining connections' rather than 'building connections' for the north. We should also notice that the money is to be spent between 2015 and 2020. Of the balance, that works out to around £2.6bn a year, even if it all were to go to the north. The above transport link plans suggest that about half is spread elsewhere. Not quite such a good headline, is it?

spell time at @ukmixtape @LiveTheatre

PA290075 - I Can't Spell from rashbre central on Vimeo.

Another tune from the Halloween Mixtape.

I'd previously looked at the lyrics from the song from which this is derived, but I'd decided that there were insufficient words to make anything from it.

I was completely wrong, as Chris demonstrates here, with his adaptation.

Anyone know the original song or artist? Clue: it's a suitable Halloween theme.

still time to comment on British Bold Creative...

There's only a few days left to send any comments in to the BBC Trust about the plans for the BBC's future.

I've read the "British Bold Creative" paper which sets out the BBC forward plans, and which I thought was actually quite good. I've also added my voice to the suggestions for improvements to the service over the next period, after following the complicated trail to get to the relevant feedback form.

The idea that the future is based in linear broadcasting is outdated and the BBC is already operating with the wider consumerisation and customisation options. The concept of MyBBC can't be far away, with most households already using the services in unique combinations.

The diagram above shows a potential direction, with multiple platforms offering unique choices across a wide range of initiatives. The BBC also needs to ensure it stays in the mind of the full range of the population, from iPlay-based childrens' services through iPlayer and linear programming.

The telly and the other ways to consume programme content are changing fast now. Gone are the days that it was possible to shout at the TV and nothing happened, nowadays it is likely to ask "what would you like to view?"

The UK has a strong track record producing good quality material and it doesn't take long flittering around the lower reaches of the Sky subscription to start to find programming with the advertising breaks wound up to the Ofcom Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising (“COSTA”) maximum levels.

That means more advert breaks of longer duration in a programme, but also has the effect of diluting the audience even further - who can be bothered to watch something where the programming is sliced into tiny fragments with carousel advertising every few minutes?

The new TV advertising rules started yesterday, and include interesting phrases like:

[non public service channels] “must not exceed an average of 12 minutes of television advertising and teleshopping spots for every hour of transmission across the broadcasting day, of which no more than 9 minutes may be television advertising”

Inevitably there's huge amounts of description of what constitutes '30 minutes' in the new code and whether it's log, TX, EPG, or clock time because, for example, it can effect how much advertising children are provided.



Add in that well-known mild-grey coloured 'P' symbol that is stealthily displayed on many programmes now (Product placement - see Coronation Street above) and the 'Sponsored By' pieces and there's a whole world of advertising ready to pounce on linear viewers. First ever UK regulated product placement was the Dolce Gusto coffee machine shown at the top of this post and featured on This Morning back in 2011.

@ukmixtape The Secret Halloween Tapes @LiveTheatre

Silence from me over the last few days, whilst I've been travelling. Here's a hastily uploaded extract from the Mixtape Halloween show which ran at Live Theatre.

I grabbed the video during a rehearsal, so there's some extra direction voiceovers which you'll have to pretend is from Mixtape Radio.

In case you think the song is from Rocky Horror Picture Show, that would be far too easy.

this Fargo thing's only getting bigger

I watched the first episode of Fargo Season 2 a few days ago.

The opening sequence, even before the Waffle Hut section was so dense that I had to rewind and watch it again to overcome a kind of sensory overload.

There's a live version of 'Oh Well' playing across the credits. A made-up mono Reagan movie about a real battle. Or was it?

The modern take on 1970's cinematography. Detailed lighting as snow gently falls.

A confession, I've actually now watched the first episode twice and am really looking forward to episode 2.

I won't divulge any plot here, suffice to say that it is dark, clever and funny in a warped way. Plenty of potential. If you like this sort of thing.

dandy highwaymen need not apply

They say that George Osborne is a great tactician, but I'm starting to wonder how that can be a possible? Unless 'tactic' is another word for something else?

Before the election Osborne and Co gave a very strong impression that there would not be big cuts to the less well-off. Indeed this could be seen as exploiting a gap. The £10bn of extra savings required would come from elsewhere, although the actual source was never described. So the tactic was to not explain this before the election and to then quickly implement something after reaching power. A kind of 'stand and deliver' tactic?

Then there was the matter of the Treasury Select Committee, which urged that the proposed changes be reconsidered. This wasn't a quick aside, but a lengthy meeting with Osborne in a hot seat across the table from the Committee urging a different approach. Osborne's tactic was to hold his ground with his right eye on the £4.5bn. After the Lords rebuttal, his subsequent tactic has been to say he is listening.

Then the tactic of using a statutory instrument to speed through the change, instead of a new Act of Parliament. This means it is regarded as a change to something already in place, rather than something fundamentally new. More for tweaks than for fundamental changes.

Maybe the tactic to rename the tagline of the party as being the workers' party. No Orwellian doublespeak here, of course.

Then when it all went wrong in the House of Lords, a couple of new tactics emerged. First was one to accuse the Lords of wrecking things contained in the Conservative manifesto. This doesn't seem quite right to me, Osborne and the Conservatives did their best to not discuss their plans for changes to benefits before the election.

The second new tactic is to challenge the Lords power of veto. Divert the discussion to a constitutional one about power. This isn't the bigger debate about the second chamber, more one avoiding any further trip-ups for Osborne.

And today's new tactics, to say that the changes to the Lords will need to be careful considered, but then as Chris Grayling has already remarked, to draw up some proposals to change them in 'the next few hours'. And finally, to rotate a range of ministers through the TV and radio studios, fully on message with all of Osborne's agenda.

So let's review those tactics:

• avoid mentioning the tax credit reform before the election
• have a plan ready for fast implementation after reaching power
• avoid listening to the major concerns expressed by Treasury Select Committee
• adopting a workers' party moniker, playing on a particular use of the wording
• using a statutory instrument to downplay the change through Parliament
• after Lords rejection claim to have been listening all along
• misrepresenting the manifests as part of the Lords rejection
• diverting attention to the Lords powers
• pressure selling the point of view through any media that will listen

I realise I'm using the word tactic in a particular way in this description. Some would choose to use another word.

kitchen LEDs run interference on DAB radio shock

One of the kitchen refit changes was to replace the previous halogen ceiling lights with LED downlighters.

There was an unexpected side effect. The DAB radio stopped working. Switch on the LEDs and immediately the DAB radio reception fades.

Initially I thought it could be a specific wiring or transformer problem but then I dialled it up on a couple of consumer forums and yes, it is a common problem.

It's yet another thing they don't tell you about the so-called progressive technology of DAB. The switched power supplies required to run the 12 volt LEDs can create large amounts of interference in the same radio frequency spectrum that DAB uses to broadcast.

Curiously, it seems to be mainly kitchen refits that feature in the questions about this. I guess it is because of the number of people that use stand-alone kitchen radios with very basic aerials.

Caption: The kitchen lights are making the radio fuzzy

Next I stumbled upon the the CE test called EN55022, Class B (domestic usage) which is supposed to test that lights won't create more than a set level of interference in the 30MHz-1GHz range. That's across plenty of radio spectrum, including the 210MHz-300MHz range used in DAB broadcasting.

Guess what?

Halogen lights attain good results well below the interference levels. Swap in low-voltage LEDs and both generic and famous name brand LEDs coupled to their transformers can operate above the interference threshold at certain frequencies, particularly in the DAB range.

To figure out our situation I'd tried three different DAB radios from an inexpensive Goodmans, a mid-range Pure and an expensive Roberts. All turned into clucking chickens when the lights were switched on.

Some of the forum folk had been using trial and error to swap out (expensive) LED bulbs or (even more expensive) transformers, often without fixing the situation. In our case I'll plug in an external aerial, but it's not the solution for everyone because sometimes they don't have a nearby aerial socket for their radio.

It also defeats the object of a simple, portable radio that can operate digitally.

Another yellow card for DAB because it is so sensitive to this type of interference. Add that to the low bit-rate often used in DAB broadcasts and we have a technology that is only borderline fit-for-purpose.

Except when The Archers comes on.

bike yikes

I thought I'd better check progress against plan on the year's bicycling. I set the three targets as 2000,3000 and 4000 miles. Bronze, Silver, Gold.

I've hit the first two and still have a couple of months to do the last 545 miles. Some people would think that fairly easy, but I suspect it will be close to the wire by year end.

That's partly because we hit the choppy part of the year in terms of interruptions and sundry reasons for not cycling.

Excuses, I know, but I'm being pragmatic. I'll probably go out later today and get the remaining miles closer to 500, but I may need to plan it out if I'm to be sure of hitting my personal gold.

don't talktalk about it

CBBC star Hacker T Dog.
The current hack into TalkTalk's website creates an interesting taste of living in the cloud. The perpetrators are now claiming to have 4 million customer records and apparently have even issued a ransom note like something from a TV plot.

We've all got far more data than we care to think about lodged away in systems which increasingly work in the cloud. Part of that is because we all also want to be able to access these systems from smartphones and browsers, rather than sit on interminably long calls to so-called help desks.

Another reason is because industry is all being persuaded that it is economically sound to put their systems into cloud computing environments.

Systems like Google also progressively tie all our data together, so that even if you want to have a separate personal and professional appearance in the internet, the G+ robots will eventually catch up.

I use one of those automatic password generators for my own access to systems. It comes up with passwords along the lines of:

ryeX-Uc-bEv-jaw-oD-fIn-inG

And nope, I'm not actually using that one and I've selected randomised lengths too, so the syntax of my actual passwords will differ.

Of course I can't remember them all, and have to use 1Password to wrangle them.

The problem comes when people use passwords like -er- qwerty12345 or asdfg-0987 or password1992 or CFC4evva. It's because there's a high social engineering probability that this type of user will be using the same password elsewhere. So browsing through an unencrypted list of users, there'll be some that are probably easier to target, simply based upon the type of password they use.

Back to TalkTalk. The story goes that the hackers used a denial of service attack first as a diversionary tactic, whilst the slurping of data was taking place. The thieves even put up an extract of the data they stole onto a website to illustrate what they've done.

The data (if genuine) was still being displayed today, Saturday, some four days after the attack.

If I was John who drives taxis, Hadyn, Norma, Fraser, Catherine, Dolph or Amanda, amongst many others, I'd be pretty annoyed that my record was still on public display. If I was Ben or Rahmet, I'd be even more annoyed that my entire TalkTalk order was listed (update it's all still there on 26 Oct)

I'm not buying it though. Getting into a website is one thing. Like that opening sequence in Homeland the other day when the dodgy internet club managed to hack into the CIA. Then they immediately started downloading files that were at the core of the CIA's best secrets in Germany.

Yeah, right. It's sometimes hard enough finding files on one's own systems, let alone on a secret CIA station in Berlin.

But that seems to be what these hackers claim to have done as well.

Not only did they flood the TalkTalk system to make it run slowly, they then claim to have used this same period to get inside, and somehow find the exact files where the cellphone and SIM orders were kept, in clear (i.e. not encrypted format), and all comma delimited.

The method of intrusion as described is all a bit too tidy.

This smacks to me more of something purposeful conducted from inside TalkTalk's walls. It could be a whole lot simpler too. The conditions: Someone with access to the right files runs/introduces a pre-formed SQL query generating an Excel CSV (comma separated values) file and then downloads it to a memory stick, or via bluetooth to a phone.

This could be in a central location (operations or development), or possibly even from a helpdesk if there's local copies of the customer file. No wonder the class of tools to do these kind of dubious things are called Mole, Pangolin (scaly burrowing anteater) and Injector.

I guess it will all play out over the forthcoming days and weeks. It might also explain why the note accompanying the upload of the stolen data contains a message which says things like:

"We Have Made Our Tracks Untraceable Through Onion Routing, Encrypted Chat Messages, Private Key Emails, Hacked Servers."

Why bother to say These Things And With So Many Capital Letters? It's a bit like the villain's speech to explain the next logic jump to James Bond.

There's more, but it starts getting into a more lurid and fundamentalist area which I won't document here. The slightly juvenile style looks quite different from the increasingly common attacks on casino sites with distributed denial of service and BitCoin as ransom.

The eventual after-effect of this TalkTalk attack will probably be to create even more layers of security for not just TalkTalk's site, but everyone else.

Coincidentally, a few days ago I described a situation where a big commercial site had mis-transcribed my address in a way that meant they would only send things to a (wrong) address to Plot (wrong Number) in (wrong town) Shellsea in order to identify me.

A few days later I saw a different example on television, where (wrong name) Dr.Occupier was being incorrectly billed for electricity but could not change it because the security questions needed his/her name "Dr.Occupier" to be specified.

I suppose we can't have all this smartphone cloud access without the attendant security, so cue those sayings about the indolent falling prey to the active or about freedom, liberty and vigilance - I'm sure we'll be hearing them all over the next few days.

shake it off

I wonder what will happen now that all the freebie subscriptions to Apple Music have run out?

For many, they actually ran out a month ago, but I expect there's a lot of people like me who don't remember until the money is quietly extracted from the credit card.

When the Apple system started, I thought I'd give it a go, but in honesty, I can't say that it has worked for me.

In iTunes I still mainly play my own choices of music, based upon my CD and download collection and playlists, but I've seldom used the Apple suggestions. I deliberately downgraded my Spotify back to freebie when I started, as a way to remind myself to use the Apple alternative.

So why didn't it work?
For me the Apple recommendations have always been so crass that I wondered what else I needed to do. Maybe there was another part of the system that didn't just assume I wanted to listen to recent pop, MoR and dad rock? My Apple Music recommendations regularly feature One Direction, Jean Michell-Jarre(?), Justin Bieber, Wally Murs, Pure Rave. If this was last.fm, it would be screaming musical compatibility - low.

Maybe it is because I haven't used it enough and I just get generic suggestions?

I've been using iTunes for many years and Apple have slurped in around 2.5k albums and 22k tracks that I have loaded. My stretchy taste in albums have been through their Genius process and Match, yet they come up with commercial 'top of the pops' suggestions. Perhaps it's their "don't know what to do" default.

I think the last couple of albums I bought were towards the popular end of the spectrum - Wolf Alice and Tame Impala, both of which are probably at least 'indie' in their iTunes genre classification?

To illustrate, that's Ellie Rowsell and the rest of Wolf Alice in Haringey early this year.

What next?
Today, after cancelling the Apple Music subscription, I restarted Spotify Premium, logged on and hit play.

It was an instantly better experience for discovering new music. Sure, I like listening to tracks I know, but sometimes to let Spotify wander off and find 20 or more tracks in a row without any need to hit skip. Far better.

So I'll stick with Spotify as the discovery mechanism, use iTunes as a player and continue to buy via a combination of artist web-sites, an occasional browse in Rough Trade or Fopp and online Amazon CDs with Autorip.

fire up the flux capacitor

I don't care if they got a few things wrong, I shall still watch these movies again sometime over the next couple of days. There's so many references still used today; who ever sees a Delorean car without thinking about Back To The Future?

And what about the idea of a flux capacitor? Or a hoverboard? They guessed a few things which are now commonplace like VR goggles, wearable technology, tablet computers, even if they missed the smartphone.

1.21 Gigawatts (Jigowatts?) might be more than 10% of the UK's nuclear power capacity, but it's still the amount needed to take an 88mph car through time.

Fortunately there are still people trying, like this car I spotted in a field. I'm wondering whether Doctor Who has ever met The Deloreans? If he hasn't then there's a quick line for a script sometime.

And by the time I write this, I see America will be waking up to a special issue of USA Today...The Hill Valley edition, delivered by Compu Fax Satellite.

I'm sure there will be a box-set DVD and some special content, but I can't help thinking this is one of the few movies that it would be fun to see with advert breaks. From 1985, of course.

And don't tell anyone, but an original-market Delorean speedometer only goes up to 85 mph ;-)