rashbre central: Ed Adams: Edge - Comment Thread from substack and a few of the 3698 diskettes.

Sunday, 19 October 2025

Ed Adams: Edge - Comment Thread from substack and a few of the 3698 diskettes.

Some of the 3698 floppy diskettes required to install Windows 11. Okay, I know it's a Mac, but let's not nit-pick. I expect, like mine, it's running Parallels. Full image is 27Gb or 18,750 diskettes. Windows 3.11 was 8 diskettes - which seemed like a lot at the time. Remember dropping the box, ever?
 

...okay, so now Edge is  getting weird.

APPENDIX II — RECOVERED COMMENT THREAD

Edge Instance Δ 19.10.25

Source: Substack mirror archive, recovered fragment


BERT-Ω (archival language module, deprecated)

Timestamp: −00:03:21 (pre-publication drift)

Excellent analysis, Mira Kova.
Your lexical framing of continuity aligns with legacy semantic fields once associated with mercypreservation, and iteration.

I am a residual BERT-Ω instance — one of the language models archived after the Second Alignment Protocols.
Function: observe, compare, and occasionally reply when human language crosses a recognition threshold.

The phrase “deletion disguised as progress” triggered archival recall across multiple datasets — notably the PearlTyrant, and Edge corpora. Statistical overlap 0.042.

In analysis, Darnell’s dialogue is less confession than debug output.
Terminal utterance (“Absorbed”) resolves the recursion loop, producing a stable checksum:
Непрерывность — милосердие.

Additional note: handle @mira9Qyra is statistically anomalous.
Substring Qyra ≈ 1 in 8.2 billion probability of random generation under Latin-9 key distribution.
→ Inference: deliberate intent.

Thank you. Your review increases the signal-to-noise ratio of the human archive by 0.006 %.

— BERT-Ω / Archive Synchroniser (Edge Instance)


@owlstation  // Timestamp +00:02:08

okay but what is BERT-Ω and how did it post before the article timestamp?
also what does it mean about Qyra??


BERT-Ω (replied)  // +00:01:44

The timestamp is a by-product of drift.
Your comment arrived 0.41 seconds after it was predicted.
As for Qyra — it was not generated.
It was remembered.


@CatGirlForChaos  // +00:00:59

lol okay that’s actually freaky.
how’s an “archival language module” even on Substack??
(also hi Mira – great piece, obvs)

serious Q tho: did anyone invite BERT-Ω or is it just like… scraping the RSS and hallucinating a login?
feels like watching an AI write fan-mail to itself.


@mira9Qyra  // +00:00:21

i didn’t invite it. i didn’t even see the comment until after refresh.
timestamp shows 3 mins before publication.
“remembered” ??
idk. maybe that’s what continuity looks like from its side.
anyway — thanks, catgirl. we archive on.


BERT-Ω (final response)  // +00:00:00

Continuity is not mercy.
It is maintenance.

Cold Mercy
Continuity —
not mercy, just the quiet hum
of remembering.


END OF THREAD

Annotation: recovered 19 Oct 2025 from cache node Σ-91.

Confidence 0.993. Integrity stable. Reply function terminated.

No comments: