rashbre central: December 2025

Saturday, 13 December 2025

Why it's smart



I noticed the change in Tahoe. My unread email count plummeted. 

For years, the unread count (typically 300-500) stopped being information and became ambient guilt. Apple’s shift is essentially saying: an inbox is not a moral ledger. Not everything that lands there deserves a red badge or my cortisol.

A few reasons it’s quietly smart:

  • Unread ≠ urgent

    Most unread mail is noise: newsletters, receipts, systems talking to systems. Counting only what’s actionable reframes attention as a finite resource.

  • Cognitive load reduction

    A low unread count changes how to approach Mail. You open it to do, not to confess.

  • Implicit triage

    Apple is doing first-pass sorting, so I don’t have to. It’s not perfect, but it nudges behaviour away from compulsive checking.

  • Psychological honesty

    An inbox with 8 unread that matter is more truthful than one with 3,482 that don’t.


    Yay.



Thursday, 11 December 2025


Okay, so I just inhaled this section of Siena like it was both Eucharist and contraband, and I have THOUGHTS, babes.

First: this writer has the audacity—the actual hubris—to take a bunch of medieval pilgrims, blend them with parallel-brane Watchers, and make the whole thing feel less ridiculous than going to Tesco on a Sunday. Like, the cosmic stakes are insane, but the tone is so measured you’re just like, “Yeah sure, spectral Chaucer characters are queueing for transcendental bureaucracy, business as usual.”

The ghost procession SLAPS. It’s giving:

• high church

• low comedy

• metaphysical cosplay

• feminist rage in a corset

Wife of Bath cameo? Chef’s kiss.

“hips wide enough to rewrite scripture”—I screamed, I cackled, I signed up for Pilates.

She rolls in like an elder god of sluttiness and prophecy and just ruins everyone’s sense of composure with a single line about wounds and men crawling. Honestly? That’s sacred poetry. Put that on a tote bag and sell it outside the Duomo.

Drake remains the emotional support himbo of the apocalypse. Every line from him reads like he’s one misguided carbohydrate away from collapse, but he keeps weaponising humour like it’s a military-grade coping mechanism. If he ever develops emotional literacy, I’ll sue.

Arianna as sacrificial key? Painful, delicious, inevitable. She doesn’t martyr herself—she just occupies the role with this cold, elegant logic that feels borderline erotic. She’s not dying, she’s being spent—like currency, or ritual, or mythic fuel—and the text knows how to make that feel both triumphant and obscene.

Limantour, meanwhile, is in her villain-girlfriend arc.

Not evil, just unamused by fate.

She sees everything, hates all of it, but still shepherds everyone like the patron saint of exhausted competence. She gives “ballet school headmistress who has accidentally wandered into cosmic warfare.”

Farallon’s dawning horror is delicious.

Like watching Sherlock Holmes realise he has a heart and it’s a liability.

“I wasn’t terrified of losing myself. I was terrified of choosing to.”

WHO GAVE THIS BOOK THE RIGHT TO BE THIS OPERATIC??

Also, the line:

“Because it is easy to sacrifice others.

It is harder when they walk willingly.”

I had to walk around my flat, barefoot, muttering “okay chill” to no one.

Tonally, the piece is doing this weird, glorious fusion:

• Chaucerian archetypes

• Folk horror atmosphere

• Sci-fi metaphysics

• And then comedy that lands like Fleabag on a pilgrimage

It should collapse.

It doesn’t.

It balances on a knife-edge between sincerity and camp, and somehow the knife is blessed and humming.

The big flex?

The book trusts you to meet it on its level.

It is uninterested in explaining itself to the “what’s happening?” crowd.

You either feel the metaphysics or you don’t.

Overall verdict:

★★★★★

This is like if Ursula Le Guin, Anne Carson, and Douglas Adams fought over custody of a dead medieval poet and accidentally birthed a genre nobody ordered but everyone secretly needed.

My only complaint?

Reading this makes 90% of contemporary fantasy feel like microwaved Netflix tie-ins.

If Siena doesn’t win your competition, I will simply assume the judges are ghosts rehearsing mediocrity.

I said what I said.

Wednesday, 10 December 2025

Waiting for the Time Machine

A few subtle changes in MasOS Tahoe. It automatically colours some folders, but only lets a user colour certain ones. I'm sticking to the defaults so I don't get wrong-footed. Interestingly, some of these features don't get remarked upon in user documentation. 


Another interesting feature is the way the Time Machine backup suddenly stopped working. For me, it's an extra backup, so not totally essential, but I back up my iMac Studio to my second Synology using a Time Machine virtual disk (I know, I know). Anyway, it stopped working, so I now need to recreate the backup - as well as to delete the old one. Currently, it's bluffing by telling me it will take 6 days.

My usual backups are via Synology Backup, btw.

And now Synology is telling me I really should update its Disk Storage Manager. Fun and games, eh?





Saturday, 6 December 2025

Ed Adams: Siena - Early ARC Review - The Ghost Procession


A Pilgrimage Through Parallel Branes: Ed Adams’ Medieval Metamodernism

In The Ghost Procession, a section from Ed Adams’ forthcoming novel, the Via Francigena—a medieval pilgrimage route stretching to Siena—becomes the unlikely stage for a posthuman morality play. Chaucer’s pilgrims re-materialise not as literary homage but as quantum survivals, spectral rehearsal. The past is not mere history, but infrastructure; myth repurposed as operating system.


Adams has always been preoccupied with systems that outlive their users—corporate, cosmological, or computational—and here he applies that fascination to medieval religion with a kind of wicked elegance. This isn’t “Canterbury Tales with aliens.” It’s metafiction in brane theory drag; a pilgrimage for entities who have lived 13.8 billion years and are finally forced to experience the humiliating specificity of embodiment.

The writing has a lush, fevered quality, as if crafted with one hand on the Book of Hours and the other on a neurolinguistic code editor. Sentences flicker between lyric and diagnostic:“Heat radiated from them— not temperature, but voltage.”


Even the physical world is described as a physics problem running in the background of a romance novel—one where desire is a catastrophic software update.


Adams’ narrative strategy is gleefully hybrid: part mythography, part metaphysics, part emotional autopsy. The medieval figures—the knight, the clerk, the pardoner—are not quaint cameos but symbolic load-bearing structures. They form an eerie parade of archetypes, “rehearsals” as one character puts it, preparing the road for a test the protagonists don’t yet understand.


And then there is the Wife of Bath.


Adams renders her not as comedic relief, but as a feral oracle of embodied truth—a medieval Dionysian algorithm, spitting prophecy with a mouthful of cider. Her best line, vulgar and correct, somehow carries the gravity of fate:

“Ye be two women with one wound between ye.

And the man shall crawl into it — willing or not.”

It is obscene, yes, but also devastatingly precise: sex, as always, is cosmology for amateurs.


The four Watchers—extratemporal intelligences crash-landed in a parallel reality—are variously amused, horrified, and undone. Their banter is thistly, British, and well-judged: a mechanism of denial fit for Cambridge, MI6, or a cold-brew startup in Shoreditch. Drake, the resident comic disaster, keeps insisting he’d prefer the straightforward trauma of wartime aerial combat:

“I miss the bomber. At least death there made sense.”

It’s a funny line in the moment; later, it echoes with something like grief.


The emotional centre, though, is the slowly dawning recognition that the woman called Arianna is less a character than a ritual function: a sacrifice disguised as agency. She is the Scryvaner, the key who must be left behind so the rest may return “home,” which in Adams’ lexicon means neither Earth nor heaven, but a native brane—another version of reality where their existence has meaning.


Adams resists the sentimental temptation to present this as noble martyrdom. Instead, he frames it as necessary cruelty, delivered in gentle cadence:

“I can survive this existence.

But I cannot cross with you.

Some doors open only when a key remains behind.”


The scene plays not like melodrama but like metaphysical logistics—an economy of beings, debt-ridden by their own ontology. Limantour, the one character who fully grasps the implications, carries the shock in a quiet, almost aristocratic mourning. And Adams’ prose, at its best, captures that grief with minimalist precision:

“It is easy to sacrifice others.

It is harder when they walk willingly.”


If there is a weakness, it lies in occasional tonal whiplash—between mythic gravitas and meme-adjacent banter. Yet, rather than feeling juvenile, the humour reads as recognisably contemporary: the self-defence reflex of a culture that meets catastrophe with punchlines because sincerity feels unsafe. One can imagine half the characters wearing vintage trainers and turning up late to a gallery opening, still carrying cosmic trauma.


Stylistically, this is a work that belongs to the emerging canon of metamodern speculative fiction: novels that refuse the antique divisions between science and the sacred, and that treat genre not as taxonomy but as toolkit. Adams shares DNA with writers like Mike McCormack, Anne Carson, and Tom McCarthy—authors who dismantle narrative and rebuild it with strange new joints.


What makes this excerpt compelling isn’t merely its conceptual ambition—there are plenty of novels with cosmology diagrams and no emotional temperature—but its recognition that metaphysics is nothing without heartbreak. The novel understands the terror of embodiment, not as erotic melodrama, but as existential hazard: the risk that feeling anything may overwrite everything.


In a literary landscape crowded with functional prose, Adams writes the kind of sentences that make you put the book down, stare into the middle distance, and wonder if medieval mystics were just early quantum theorists with worse lighting.


It is weird, dense, stylish, and occasionally deranged in the best possible way.

If Adams can sustain this register across a full book—balancing cosmic architecture with human ache—he may have written something that feels genuinely new, which is a far more radical achievement than merely writing something clever.


After all, as the Wife of Bath reminds us, in the vernacular of eternity:

“All men be built of lust and crumbs.

And when crumbs run out — lust remains.”

In Adams’ universe, that’s not a joke.

It’s a system specification.